James Roguski - United Nations General Assembly 2024
FreeNZ In Conversation
Liz Gunn has done an update with journalist James Roguski, a leading voice on researching, and alerting us all about, the ongoing meetings and plans at the WHO and United Nations, including the upcoming 2024 UN General Assembly from 23 - 27 Sept, and the UN Summit Of The Future from 20 - 23rd Sept.
These will be key events to watch, in order to find out what the gobbling globalist institutions are planning.
We are grateful to have James’ quality research covering all this, and more, via his Substack.
In the conversation, we touch on an wide array of subjects, and also highlight many of James’ custom domains, such as:
The domains offer an avenue into much deeper research. They serve as comprehensive information archives, which James has carefully compiled, to help empower those of us on the “pro-free choice” wave.
Save those links if you ever need them in a debate!
James also mentions that Kirsten Murfitt has submitted a Citizens Initiated Referendum to give the people of New Zealand an opportunity to express their desire to #NZExitsTheWHO. See the link above.
There is a still-shocking reminder in the discussion that, under Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand has pledged a huge amount of (tax-payer funded) money ($24.3 million) to be allocated towards funding for Bill Gates’- backed GAVI.
Perhaps one of the most memorable excerpts from the discussion, is James’ cogent summary of the purpose of such widespread use of drugs and vaccines - and propaganda for them - by Big Pharma.
The short clip below, and the transcript thereof, tell us all about a largely unspoken Truth that cuts to the heart of the corruptions in current medicine as it is practised today:
Customer Acquisition Tools For Big Pharma | Clip
Clip Transcript:
WHO and all of these negotiations, they want to be in the position to oversee the business aspect of it, the approving of products so that they can be manufactured, then put in some sort of depot so that they're there, you know, whenever they need to pull them off the shelves to use to scare people, it's difficult to get your local tyrants to inject people with vaccines or any other type of treatment if you don't have it sitting on the shelf ready to go.
And what they learned was that the nations who did not have the manufacturing capacity, primarily Africa, but other nations in other areas that are low income, they weren't able to abuse the people in the manner that they had hoped.
And so what these negotiations are really all about is let's take billions of dollars and build out the infrastructure where it was missing so that we can have a problem here and a problem there and a problem there.
And the local oligarchs can profit by homegrown, you know, geographically distributed manufacturing of products that harm people.
I mean, the drugs like remdesivir and midazolam and all of the, you know, antivirals that did not work and cause problems, you cannot even begin to even remotely think that AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson's Jabs, which had been removed from the market because of the harm they caused, was a wonderful beneficial innovation.
And you can't say the same thing about Moderna or Pfizer's or Novartis or any of the other products.
Yes they did not kill everyone who took it.
But when you deal with statistics and you realize that even a tiny little percent of harm, when you do that to 8 billion people or whatever the number may have been that they injected, you're causing enormous harm and death to an enormous number of people.
And that is not acceptable.
You cannot say any of these drugs or jabs are safe and effective because they're neither.
They're dangerous to a percentage of the population immediately.
And then the long-term aspects of it with the turbo cancers and all of the immune dysfunction and everything else, I've always referred to tests and drugs and jabs as customer acquisition tools for big pharma.
They take healthy people, they convince them that they need to have a checkup or a test or a screening mammograms for women in breast cancer or prostate specific antigen tests, PSA tests for men with prostate issues or blood pressure or cholesterol or sugar.
Take a healthy person, run enough tests on them, you're going to occasionally find a result that's just wrong or off temporarily and it's used as a hard high pressure sales tactic to convince people to swallow or inject a poison that degrades their health and oh, well, you got to take that for the rest of your life and you got to come back for more tests and more MRIs and it's a customer acquisition tool.
They convinced probably millions of people that were totally healthy, that they were asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 virus that has never been proven to exist simply on the basis of a test.
And so if you have any test, even if it's 99% accurate, that 1% margin for error rate, if you give it to billions of people, you could generate a case demo pseudo pandemic anytime you want just by running enough people through your fraudulent test.
Great editorial and echo of this reader's thoughts. Keep trolling and eventually we'll have more and more TRUTH seekers, sceptics looking for commonsense leadership and, more importantly, people putting God first in all that they do!
We have not forgotten our duty to heal our damaged brothers and sisters.