What Constitutes a WEF Champion?

The Symbolic Importance Given To NZ's Prime Minister at Summer Davos Last Week

The Annual Meeting of the New Champions, 2023

New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins attended last week’s World Economic Forum (WEF) 14^th Annual Meeting of the New Champions meeting, also known as “Summer Davos”, in Tianjin, China. 1,500 participants are reported to have attended, at an annual membership cost for ‘New Champions’ of €24,000 per year.

Hipkins was the first speaker at the second session, Braving the Headwinds: Rewiring Growth Amid Fragility on Day One. The session was chaired by WEF President, Norwegian Børge Brende, who highlighted China’s successful economy before introducing the session.

They shared the stage with the PM of Barbados; PM of Vietnam; Chairman of China’s State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), “in charge of many of the important companies in China”; and President of the World Trade Organization.

The panel appeared entirely scripted, with no dialogue or debate. Each speaker focused on a distinct theme and Brende posed patently planned questions. The same euphemisms appeared repeatedly, such as challenges, opportunities, crises, sustainability, uncertainty, equity, inclusiveness, resilience, decoupling and de-risking.

Hipkins promoted New Zealand as a role model for clean, green and sustainable policies. He claimed that “awarance [sic] of climate change is becoming more pronounced everyday”, and that renewable energy is more affordable than that generated from fossil fuels. He assured Brende that New Zealand firmly supports both bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements, referring repeatedly to the ‘CPTPP’.

Many New Zealanders agree with Hipkins, that climate change is becoming more pronounced: as yet another recitable script. A highly recommended 2015 presentation by Greenpeace founder Dr Patrick Moore demonstrates clear scientific detail refuting the climate change narrative.

Following Hipkins, each panelist delivered their own recital on a specific subtopic within the overall theme of cooperation between nations and global governance as a solution to urgent problems. Barbados focussed on the forecast cost of US$1.5 trillion to address the climate crisis to be governed by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Vietnam mentioned a broader range of crises, also directing his solutions towards globalised control. China promoted Chinese economic policy as a role model for the world to follow. WTO outlined the need to include economies which have not yet integrated into a globalised system.

The audience were informed that pre-determined solutions to multiple global crises must be implemented urgently and at great cost to both public and private sectors, via central controllers.

Other ‘Summer Davos’ Sessions

All 38 sessions of the three day event can be viewed via the conference programme link. Topics included green energy, emerging technologies, environmental harm caused by human activities, health care systems, free trade, global debt, food security, and waste management. The overarching theme is that global-level crises can only be resolved through global-level public-private partnerships using innovation and digitalised technology.

The Opening Plenary with Li Qiang deserves a special mention. PM Hipkins was front row, three seats from WEF Founder and Executive Chairman, Klaus Schwab. In his opening address Schwab announced the theme of the conference as “Entrepreneurship: the driving force of the global economy”, before introducing His Excellency Li Qiang, 8^th Premier of the Peoples’ Republic of China. Premier Li spoke for an extended time on four ‘important lessons’, summarised as:

1. A common good should be strived for;

2. The world needs solidarity and collaboration;

3. The world needs economic globalisation; and

4. The world needs peace and stability.

He concluded that these goals can be attained by embracing Chinese policies put forward by President Xi Jinping, for global development, global security and global civilisation.

What Is Globalisation?

In short, it is the centralisation of power over society. It necessarily involves the promotion of global crises requiring global-level solutions. Most of these crises are based on mathematical models, for example epidemiological models for disease predictions and general circulation models for climate change predictions. They use limited sets of pre-assigned assumptions and not real-world data.

Modelling has allowed globalists to build narratives around threats to humanity and our ecology. Solutions involve rules which must be followed by everyone in order to be effective.

Those providing the solutions inevitably benefit from it. Look to Bill Gates and Al Gore as two of the most extreme examples. Look to the audience at The Meeting of the New Champions for a glimpse of the world’s wealthiest planning to prosper from the opportunities being promised by what amounts to the biggest Ponzi Scheme ever foisted upon humanity.

The logic theory used in globalism is known as Hegelian Dialectic. Explained in greater detail here, it is summarised by this diagram.

What is The Great Reset?

Officially launched on 3 June 2020, The Great Reset uses the cloak of sustainable development, outlined in our recent article, to provide solutions to multiple, interconnected crises threatening the planet and humanity, including the alleged crisis of misinformation.

According to then-Prince Charles, “Unless we take the action necessary, and build in a greener and more inclusive and sustainable way, then we will have more and more pandemics.” This is demonstrably false, as data shows that pandemics are rare and have a minimal impact compared with endemic diseases such as tuberculosis and circulating respiratory viruses.

The ideology of The Great Reset is based on a theory proposed by English political economist Thomas Malthus. He claimed that famines and other disasters occur when population growth surpasses food production capacity.

Whilst pushing for policies to reduce food production, from forced farm sales in Holland to increasing livestock taxes in New Zealand, WEF promote the idea that food supplies are under threat due to climate change caused by human activity. Solutions always involve high-cost “innovation” and include laboratory grown meat and farming insects for consumption, which bring associated health concerns (see here and here), and surely use at least as much energy as farming.

The Great Reset intends to impact every aspect of human life.  To learn more, see James Corbett’s Your Guide to the Great Reset.

Image from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset

Is The Great Reset Impacting New Zealand?

Media

The Public Interest Journalism Fund was introduced by the New Zealand government in 2020. A total of $55m was distributed “to provide targeted, short- to medium-term support for roles, projects and industry development.” At the time of inception there was no mention of an ‘infodemic’, but the Disinformation Project was founded around the same time. Upon closure of the fund last week, it boasted 60,000 pieces of content and over 134 million views.

This ensured state control of our information sources. Jacinda Ardern admitted this openly at least twice during the pandemic. Infamously, on 19 March 2020 she instructed New Zealanders to “…dismiss anything else.  We will continue to be your single source of truth ... Unless you hear it from us, it is not the truth.” In November 2021, when questioned about overseas vaccination outcome data, she insisted that only questions from “accredited media” would be addressed. When the questioner persisted, she halted and moved the press conference.

During the Wellington protest, government accredited reporters informed New Zealanders about the “river of filth” from their masked lofty heights on the balcony at Parliament House. In droves, we turned to independent and citizen journalists for accounts from within Camp Freedom which exposed the dishonesty of mainstream reports.

Medical Systems

New Zealanders have never seen the contracts our government signed with Pfizer, Moderna or Novavax. In detailed testimony under oath to a Brazilian court, the head of Pfizer in Latin America stated that “the conditions negotiated between Pfizer and the government of Brazil were standard and were accepted by the 110 countries with which it had already closed a contract.” The Brazilian contract included, but was not limited to, total indemnity of Pfizer and their business partners from liability; and the right of Pfizer to recover any amount determined as owing, against Brazil’s sovereign assets, should Brazil be found liable. Read more here and here.

Is this why New Zealand government officials continue to determinedly insist contrary to the evidence, that New Zealand has no excess mortality? Is it why they continue to determinedly ignore the thousands of citizens permanently damaged by vaccine injury? Does it explain why New Zealand acted in lockstep with many nations to mandate a vaccine with obvious poor efficacy and safety profile whilst aggressively pushing “safe and effective” propaganda? Does it explain why health professionals have been placed in a stranglehold by licencing authorities to promote pharmaceutical industry pseudo-science requiring that they act against their oaths to first do no harm?

Other Industries

At least two Great Reset initiatives involve corporate governance and responsibility. These may all have a significant impact on the private sector in New Zealand, outlined briefly below.

Environment Social Governance (ESG) is an investment scheme intended to “drive change” in the corporate sector towards sustainability. Companies can no longer use only profit and sales as benchmarks for success, but must include ‘sustainable practices’ criteria. CEO of Blackrock and WEF Board of Trustees member Larry Fink is very comfortable with the practice of “forcing behaviours”.

Ratings are being introduced to force compliance to a range of ESG rules and regulations, all of which come at a high financial cost. Only those companies who can afford to comply will survive.

From here: https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G680000004EI1EAM

WEF claim that Diversity Equity Inclusion (DEI) policies and practices will require businesses across the world to spend more than US$15.4 billion by 2026 to ensure a “more inclusive world” for minorities. As with ESG, DEI places responsibility on corporations to implement social policies which embed a social contract into business practice. This inevitably increases rules, regulations and costs that can ultimately bankrupt small business owners.

Programmable Money

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are being planned via WEF, in partnership with major financial institutions such as the Bank of International Settlements. Once cash is phased out centralised and programmable CBDCs will become the only currency.

This will give authorities unprecedented control over individual and business money flow. In the UK, Nigel Farage has been de-banked, seemingly due to his ‘unacceptable’ political views. The bank accounts of protesting Canadian truckies and their supporters were frozen in 2022. These are clues as to the ways in which globalists plan, and will be able, to control whole populations via CBDCs.

Conclusion

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines Fascism as “a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”

The World Economic Forum is a globalist institution promoting Fascist ideologies. Our conclusion from the actions of our political leaders over the past three years, and the symbolic importance given to our Prime Minister at Summer Davos last week, is that New Zealand is under threat of losing our democratic rule, national sovereignty and civil liberties, to powerful corporatised interests.

Please demand that your political representatives explain their position with regards to New Zealand government involvement in the World Economic Forum.  We need an immediate withdrawal from the WEF and we must remove those public servants from power, who seek to enrich themselves via WEF involvement. Only with the support of enough New Zealand citizens can we return to our position as a nation upholding the ideals of democracy and freedom and rejecting the ideology of Fascism.