There are laws about coercion! The Govt. is corporate; employers are corporations that have contracts with the Corporate Govt. that basically force them under duress to apply the mandates even though mandates are only voluntary. All companies need know that they may sue the govt. for the enforcement by coercion of those mandates. This is not a breakthrough ruling! It is a fraudulent "get out of jail card" for the corporate Govt. and those working for them i.e. politicians. The claim (decision) is based on half-truths designed to deflect people and companies from attacking the govt. Using lawyers and "their definitions" of their laws will only get you decisions that "they" want. Back to work guys - use the laws as they are written, not as they have been interpreted by corporate thugs (lawyers).
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. … For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
Indeed and they still are. The good thing is it’s so obvious now the scam just sticks out like dogs balls. I believe sooner or later those complicit will be held accountable
Oh, I misunderstood that. This is saying the Employers ARE to blame! Good! Because having your job depend on a medical mandate is clearly, and absolutely, WRONG. Thanks!
Now, let’s think about what to do with the DOD and Pfizer/Moderna. What to do with a govt and a system that is ANTI-HUMANITY. Let’s go!
Minister Robertson did not "notify the House" as it was a Sunday and the House was not sitting. There is consequently no report of such a notification, or any notification on this day in Hansard.
Moreover, no New Zealand media appears to have reported the following salient fact, one which may be considered an intentional omission until proved otherwise?
The Hon. Grant Robertson, New Zealand Minister of Finance, signed-off on Pfizer / Bio-NTech liability waivers on October 5, 2020, apparently notifying the NZ parliament of the Pfizer and BioNTech indemnity on 22 November. Therefore, Grant Robertson, NZ Finance Minister signed the waivers of liability BEFORE the Pfizer study DATA CUT-OFF DATE of October 9.
"At the data cut-off date of October 9, a total of 37,706 participants had a median of at least 2 months of safety data available after the second dose and contributed to the main safety data set." Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 VaccineDecember 10, 2020; N Engl J Med 2020;383:2603-2615. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
Maybe the Minister had a crystal ball? ... May be the Pfizer study "results" were already "in" and "recommended" to the Minister, 5 days before the stated data cut-off? One might even suggest that the study "results" were already known a priori, that "safe and effective" was already up and running as a political and business mantra, which seems clearly possible as NZ business leaders were co-opted by the MOH in January 2020, and then became part of a DPMC initiative in March 2020. (see DPMC published minutes).
Naturally, another possible interpretation is that the Ministerial indemnifying waiver of liability may have had absolutely nothing to do with, "safe and effective?
Thank you, Ursula. The fracturing of supply chains and inveigling pursuit of cheap raw materials appear as generic factors attached to rank profiteering and hallmarks of corruption. This is well known and identified.
On the other hand, and specifically in this case, such predilections appear preceded by an explicit and wanton disregard of ethics and morality epitomised by Finance Minister Robertson's extension of indemnity to Pfizer and BioNTech (even before the NEJM Pfizer study stated data cut-off), by no jab/job coercion policy, and further, as claimed by CEPI/BC, no one allegedly knew how to expedite the mass manufacture of the synthetic polynucleotide/LNP shots (this is unlikely and represents in my view, manufactured plausible deniability).
"Of course, disadvantages include the novel nature of both mRNA and DNA vaccines without any licensed vaccine with either technology to date and lack of experience for mass production."
P.-H. Lambert, D. M. Ambrosino, S. R. Andersen et al., Consensus summary report for CEPI/BCMarch 12–13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines, Vaccine.
I suspect that the scale of this evil is breathtaking and lies far beyond the comprehension of us all.
There are laws about coercion! The Govt. is corporate; employers are corporations that have contracts with the Corporate Govt. that basically force them under duress to apply the mandates even though mandates are only voluntary. All companies need know that they may sue the govt. for the enforcement by coercion of those mandates. This is not a breakthrough ruling! It is a fraudulent "get out of jail card" for the corporate Govt. and those working for them i.e. politicians. The claim (decision) is based on half-truths designed to deflect people and companies from attacking the govt. Using lawyers and "their definitions" of their laws will only get you decisions that "they" want. Back to work guys - use the laws as they are written, not as they have been interpreted by corporate thugs (lawyers).
Bruce could you please get in touch with me - liz.gunn@freenz.org ?
Politicians, Bureaucrats and Business ~ a triumvirate to eliminate ethics; Dr Latus Dextro
Sep 11, 2023. ‘We Are Your Singular Source Of Truth’: Tyranny Is As Tyranny Does
https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/we-are-your-singular-source-of-truth
The Enemy Within
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. … For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Taylor Caldwell, A Pillar of Iron
Exactly right, Bruce. Corporate thugs who Gov pay with our tax paid money. https://open.substack.com/pub/informedheart/p/lockstep-lawyers-for-the-phantom?r=q9aq0&utm_medium=ios
Typical politicians lying through the skin of their teeth
We should all understand that this was planned and that ALL the “powerful” were complicit in it.
Indeed and they still are. The good thing is it’s so obvious now the scam just sticks out like dogs balls. I believe sooner or later those complicit will be held accountable
Typical. The Bad Guys are never to blame.
Oh, I misunderstood that. This is saying the Employers ARE to blame! Good! Because having your job depend on a medical mandate is clearly, and absolutely, WRONG. Thanks!
Now, let’s think about what to do with the DOD and Pfizer/Moderna. What to do with a govt and a system that is ANTI-HUMANITY. Let’s go!
great interview thanks Liz and Liz
As reported by RNZ, it was asserted that Grant Robertson notified the NZ Parliament regarding the Pfizer and BioNTech indemnity on 22 November 2020, after granting it to those entities on 5 October. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/435107/government-grants-vaccine-suppliers-indemnity-against-claims
Minister Robertson did not "notify the House" as it was a Sunday and the House was not sitting. There is consequently no report of such a notification, or any notification on this day in Hansard.
Moreover, no New Zealand media appears to have reported the following salient fact, one which may be considered an intentional omission until proved otherwise?
The Hon. Grant Robertson, New Zealand Minister of Finance, signed-off on Pfizer / Bio-NTech liability waivers on October 5, 2020, apparently notifying the NZ parliament of the Pfizer and BioNTech indemnity on 22 November. Therefore, Grant Robertson, NZ Finance Minister signed the waivers of liability BEFORE the Pfizer study DATA CUT-OFF DATE of October 9.
"At the data cut-off date of October 9, a total of 37,706 participants had a median of at least 2 months of safety data available after the second dose and contributed to the main safety data set." Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 VaccineDecember 10, 2020; N Engl J Med 2020;383:2603-2615. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
Maybe the Minister had a crystal ball? ... May be the Pfizer study "results" were already "in" and "recommended" to the Minister, 5 days before the stated data cut-off? One might even suggest that the study "results" were already known a priori, that "safe and effective" was already up and running as a political and business mantra, which seems clearly possible as NZ business leaders were co-opted by the MOH in January 2020, and then became part of a DPMC initiative in March 2020. (see DPMC published minutes).
Naturally, another possible interpretation is that the Ministerial indemnifying waiver of liability may have had absolutely nothing to do with, "safe and effective?
Absolutely salient. Could you please contact me on liz.gunn@freenz.org? I would like to have a way to talk to you directly.
I thank you for your valuable contribution to the dialectic here.
Yup. And yet it’s worse than that. As Hedley makes clear: https://open.substack.com/pub/hedleyrees/p/the-covid-19-supply-chain-fact-not-c38?r=q9aq0&utm_medium=ios
Thank you, Ursula. The fracturing of supply chains and inveigling pursuit of cheap raw materials appear as generic factors attached to rank profiteering and hallmarks of corruption. This is well known and identified.
On the other hand, and specifically in this case, such predilections appear preceded by an explicit and wanton disregard of ethics and morality epitomised by Finance Minister Robertson's extension of indemnity to Pfizer and BioNTech (even before the NEJM Pfizer study stated data cut-off), by no jab/job coercion policy, and further, as claimed by CEPI/BC, no one allegedly knew how to expedite the mass manufacture of the synthetic polynucleotide/LNP shots (this is unlikely and represents in my view, manufactured plausible deniability).
"Of course, disadvantages include the novel nature of both mRNA and DNA vaccines without any licensed vaccine with either technology to date and lack of experience for mass production."
P.-H. Lambert, D. M. Ambrosino, S. R. Andersen et al., Consensus summary report for CEPI/BCMarch 12–13, 2020 meeting: Assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines, Vaccine.
I suspect that the scale of this evil is breathtaking and lies far beyond the comprehension of us all.