Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DrLatusDextro's avatar

A relatively small number knew the ethical, moral, scientific and medical odds. As we now know, some of these people either purchased or bribed their way to an illusory freedom. Perhaps they can live with themselves, though one wonders how things might unfold next, when being a moral and ethical invertebrate is not necessarily a useful survival attribute. Others though, preserved their freedom and integrity but suffered the loss of their jobs and positions. One way or another, all of these were equipped with a sufficiently sensitive bullschitt antenna. However, a majority who formed the conned, the coerced, and the compliant are now a more disparate bunch, with as many as 25% suffering vaccine regret.

By my calculation, with ~75% of the entire populace in receipt of one/two jabs the number willing to submit to a re-run might sit at ~50%. In that case, the social license is unquestionably tenuous and fragile. The politicians and bureaucrats know this and they fear it. This is where we may capitalise. We need to prepare as they segue to the tyranny of CBDCs, internet censorship, and all the fear laden weight of a narrative like nuclear war or preposterous climatism nonsense, or for that matter a need to monetise water and oxygen (WEF). They need to experience and feel that they are uninvited and unwanted, that they have no mandate, none whatsoever. Meanwhile, we will never overlook the thousands that have become sickened or have died (and still do) who stand as silent ghosts bearing witness to the unfolding evil of our time and, most importantly, on just how well we do.

Expand full comment
Helen's avatar

This is so true. I said to someone this morning, that our family who are refusing to allow any dialogue around what is happening, have a propensity to always side with the most powerful. That's fine if the most powerful is good. It turns into a disaster when the most powerful are in fact, evil.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts